Solar street lighting is becoming an increasingly popular choice as a sustainable solution for outdoor illumination. But, when it comes to evaluating these systems, the common metric of ‘autonomy’ is often either oversimplified or misunderstood, as Alan Grant explains.
Unlike traditional grid-connected systems, off-grid solar lighting – as many ILP members will be well aware – operates independently, using solar panels to capture sunlight during the day and storing that energy in batteries for nighttime use.
This independence makes off-grid systems particularly valuable for illuminating roads, paths, and public spaces in remote or rural locations, where extending the electrical grid can be both costly and logistically challenging.
However, despite these advantages, solar lighting systems must be carefully designed to perform reliably through all seasons – particularly in winter, when extended nights and limited sunlight create unique challenges.
In response to these demands, the concept of ‘autonomy’, or the measure of how long a solar lighting system can operate without recharging, is often highlighted as a key performance metric.
While autonomy can offer insight, it is only one part of the picture. Autonomy figures, typically calculated under ideal conditions, may not always reflect real-world performance, particularly in challenging seasonal conditions.
UNDERSTANDING THE CHALLENGE OF WINTER SOLAR
Among the greatest challenges for off-grid solar lighting is maintaining reliable performance throughout the winter months, when the days are shortest and the nights are longest.
Solar lighting systems in winter must contend with reduced daylight hours available to recharge batteries, lower sun angles that can limit energy capture, and frequent cloud cover – particularly in northern regions – which further decreases the amount of energy that can be collected.
These seasonal limitations can be particularly demanding for systems designed with autonomy in mind, as autonomy calculations are often based on ideal or average sunlight conditions that don’t align with winter’s demands.
This winter reality is one of the main reasons why autonomy can be a misleading metric in off-grid lighting. Autonomy measures the number of days a system can operate without recharging, implying that high autonomy values ensure reliability even through stretches of cloudy weather.
Yet, autonomy calculations typically assume the battery starts fully charged and that consistent sunlight is available – neither of which is guaranteed or likely in winter conditions.
Furthermore, autonomy figures often overlook significant variability in sunlight availability by season and location.
For example, autonomy ratings calculated in southern regions with ample sunlight won’t reflect the same reliability in overcast northern winters. By simplifying such complex requirements into a single value, autonomy fails to capture the real-world challenges that off-grid lighting faces during the most demanding times of the year.
THE ‘POWER DESIGN’ ALTERNATIVE
At DW Windsor, we believe ‘power design’ offers a far more practical and realistic approach to designing off-grid solar lighting than autonomy alone.
Power design takes into account all the factors necessary for consistent lighting performance, adapting to each project’s specific needs and conditions to ensure reliability across all seasons.
So, how does this work? To deliver a system that meets the exact needs of each project, we begin by gathering essential information from the client. Each question we ask serves a specific purpose, ensuring that we have a complete picture of the project’s demands. So, for example:
- What requires illumination? Knowing the exact area or structure that needs lighting is the foundation for determining the most appropriate solution. Different environments, like a pathway, car park, or public square, have varying lighting needs and require tailored solutions.
- What lighting class or levels are required? This determines the brightness and uniformity of the light output, which is crucial for meeting safety and visibility standards. Higher-activity areas, for example, might require brighter lighting to ensure security and comfort.
- How long is lighting required and at what levels? The duration and intensity of lighting needed each night influences the PV panel, battery size and power requirements. By understanding the specific hours of operation and light levels, we can calculate the energy demands accurately, ensuring that the system can operate consistently throughout the night.
- What is the activity level at this location? The expected level of activity affects both the required lighting intensity and duration. High-traffic areas may need brighter, longer-lasting illumination, whereas lower-traffic areas might require less intense or shorter-duration lighting.
- Where is the project? The location is critical for assessing solar energy availability. Different regions receive varying amounts of sunlight, and factors like latitude and weather patterns affect solar panel output. Additionally, we focus on December’s data as it is of course the month with the lowest solar energy availability, allowing us to design for the most challenging conditions.
- Does the customer have a preferred product type? Understanding any preferences or specifications allows us to align our solutions with the client’s expectations, ensuring satisfaction with both performance and design.
In our view, using ‘power design’ ensures that the solution is not only tailored to the project’s unique conditions but is also cost-effective.
It’s easy to over-specify a product in an attempt to maximise reliability, but doing so increases costs unnecessarily. By focusing on the actual requirements – rather than relying on arbitrary autonomy figures – we believe it is possible to deliver a system that meets both performance expectations and budget constraints.
Once we understand the project requirements, the next step is to create a lighting design that carefully maps out the placement of luminaires and defines the appropriate lighting class.
This stage ensures that the system will deliver uniform, adequate illumination across the area, tailored to the specific application.
Proper luminaire positioning and selection are essential for achieving the desired lighting performance while maximising efficiency.
After defining the lighting needs, we turn our attention to the project location. By analysing the specific site, we can estimate the average hourly photovoltaic (PV) power output based on December’s solar data because of, again, being the month with the lowest sunlight availability.
Focusing on December ensures that our design accounts for the most challenging conditions, providing a solution capable of performing reliably year-round.
With this information, and knowing the project’s lighting requirements, we can build a solution around these parameters. This involves designing a system that captures sufficient solar energy to charge the battery fully and deliver the required illumination levels throughout the night, even during the darkest months.
CONCLUSION
To conclude therefore, while autonomy may seem like a convenient measure of solar performance, it often fails to capture the complexities of seasonal and location-specific challenges.
Using a power design approach, conversely, addresses these factors, allowing you to craft lighting solutions tailored to each project’s unique environment and requirements.
By focusing on the variables that truly impact performance, it is possible to ensure that off-grid lighting systems that are both dependable and efficient, whatever the season.
Alan Grant is design and development director at DW Windsor
Image: the Rampton crossing (see case study below), courtesy of DW Windsor
CASE STUDY – RAMPTON CROSSING
A pedestrian crossing has been made safer thanks to a solar lighting solution supplied by DW Windsor, writes Nic Paton.
Situated in the heart of rural Cambridgeshire, the crossing point located in Rampton, Longstanton, is heavily used by walkers and cyclists.
However, because of a lack of adequate lighting, the crossing was not clearly identifiable, posing a significant risk of injury to the public.
Given the crossing also traversed a guided bus route, high-level lighting was needed to improve visibility for bus drivers, ensuring safe passage through the area.
To tackle the problem, contractor Balfour Beatty worked with DW Windsor to specify luminaires from its solar lighting range.
Because of the significant 2000m cable required for a Grid connection, an off-grid solar solution was recommended. This eliminated the need for Grid power, ensuring a substantial reduction in the site’s carbon footprint.
Two Kirium One lanterns paired with 100W Torino Sleeve photovoltaic (PV) panels were specified, and then mounted on 6m columns on either side of the crossing to provide uniform illumination.
A dimming profile was implemented to provide adequate illumination during peak hours, while integrated PIR sensors were programmed to activate full output upon detecting movement, returning to a dimmed state after 60 seconds of inactivity.
This has significantly reduced unnecessary energy consumption, aligning with the project’s sustainability objectives.
Alan Grant, design and development director at DW Windsor, said of the scheme: ‘This project perfectly showcases the benefits of solar lighting in rural environments. By eliminating the need for Grid power and leveraging energy-efficient solutions, we’ve demonstrated how technology can enhance safety while supporting environmental goals.’
PROJECT CREDITS
Client: Cambridgeshire County Council
Contractor: Balfour Beatty
Lighting supplier: DW Windsor
This is an abridged version of the article that appears in the March edition of Lighting Journal. To read the full article, simply click on the page-turner to your right.
