Cross-pavement EV charging becoming ‘postcode lottery’ – report

The roll out of cross-pavement electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure is becoming something of a “postcode lottery”, with local authorities taking very different approaches, a newspaper has reported.

The Guardian newspaper said that, while the government is keen to expand residential EV charging, “millions of UK households may be unable to use the simple technology because their local councils will still not allow charging cables to cross the pavement”.

ILP members have expressed concern that the rapid roll out of this infrastructure is turning into something of an electrical safety ‘Wild West’.

The ILP’s Local Authority Committee is also working to carry out research into the safety of cross-pavement domestic EV charging solutions.

The Guardian article, which leans heavily on the views of gully-making providers, highlighted a range of barriers to implementation cited by councils.

These include concerns around who will maintain them, who is liable if someone trips over a gully and hurts themselves, as well as challenges over guaranteeing a parking spot directly outside the driver’s home.

The newspaper cited Kent County Council as being “concerned about electric shock risk if cables were damaged”.

Worcestershire County Council, it argued, did not “permit the breaking or any damage to the highway to install an EV charger connection”, although it would allow cable protector ramps across the pavement.

Ealing Council in west London also cited “accessibility and safety concerns”, adding that it was focusing on installing public chargers in lighting columns.

Hackney Council in central London told the newspaper it wanted to keep chargers off pavements and increase its public charger rollout.

“They all have their different processes,” Adam Dolphin, director of gully maker Gul-e, told the newspaper. “I wouldn’t say they’re an intentional barrier. They’re just working through the process, how it works.”

Image: an image from Lighting Journal’s coverage of this issue last autumn

Latest

Research highlights benefit of retrofitting to LED rather than wholesale upgrading

Transitioning to LED does deliver significant benefits around lower...

Engineering Council updates its guide to professional registration

The Engineering Council has published its latest Guide to...

Call for papers for next year’s three Lighting Live events

ILP members are being urged to submit papers for...

Lighting Live Annual Conference 2027 to move to July

The dates for next year’s Lighting Live Annual Conference...

Newsletter

Don't miss

Research highlights benefit of retrofitting to LED rather than wholesale upgrading

Transitioning to LED does deliver significant benefits around lower...

Engineering Council updates its guide to professional registration

The Engineering Council has published its latest Guide to...

Call for papers for next year’s three Lighting Live events

ILP members are being urged to submit papers for...

Lighting Live Annual Conference 2027 to move to July

The dates for next year’s Lighting Live Annual Conference...

From the edition – ‘TO DELIVER STRATEGY 2030 WE NEED YOU, OUR MEMBERS, TO ENGAGE’

The ILP has developed a new draft Strategy 2030...
spot_imgspot_img

Research highlights benefit of retrofitting to LED rather than wholesale upgrading

Transitioning to LED does deliver significant benefits around lower energy and maintenance costs, but replacing entire lighting installations need not always be necessary or...

Engineering Council updates its guide to professional registration

The Engineering Council has published its latest Guide to Professional Registration for 2026-2027. The guide aims to provide guidance on how engineers and technicians can...

Call for papers for next year’s three Lighting Live events

ILP members are being urged to submit papers for next year’s three Lighting Live events. The call for papers is to gather in ideas for...